Jon Erpenbach, Wisconsin State Senetor, is proposing that a one percent state tax be added to video games
(including computer games). His goal is to generate enough money to fund the juvenile detention system to allow 17-year-olds to be treated as minors by the courts.
“Number one, I think it’s the right thing to do because not all seventeen-year-olds belong in the adult system when it comes to non-violent offenses … secondly, in the long run, the numbers show that if you treat certain situations in a juvenile delinquent-type of a setting, as opposed to an adult setting, chances are there’s going to be less of a problem when the kid gets older,” said Erpenbach.
Although Senator Erpenbach doesn’t appear to be linking video games to the crimes of these juveniles, at least one Wisconsin Representative, Steve Nass, has taken issue with the perceived link. I’m in agreement with him that 17-year-olds involved in non-violent crime should be treated as minors, but a tax on a single product group isn’t the way to go about it. I’m confident that a smaller percentage tax increase on overall sales will be just as, or more, effective as taxing a single product group one percent.
WhatsOpen.com just launched their site in to beta, and along with the beta launch has announced the availability of their app for the Android OS. WhatsOpen.com tells you…. what is open when you search. Where can you find a coffee in Mountain View, CA at 3AM? WhatsOpen.com can tell you that.
The Android application supports GPS which is nice. There is also an iPhone formatted version, but that clearly doesn’t support GPS since the iPhone doesn’t.
Sadly, WhatsOpen.com only has listing for California at this time.
Like Karl Ribas said in his post, has Wal-Mart simply lost their minds? Sam’s Club has started offering Google Adwords advertising packages starting at $100 per month. They are also offering SEO.
There isn’t a whole lot of information available on their site and frankly the site looks pretty bad to me. I wouldn’t hire them to design my site — oh yea, they do that too.
Scivisum, a UK-based research firm is predicting that Web 2.0 will die in 2008 as companies pull advertising budgets from the user-generated content sites that make up Web 2.0. They cite questionable content as the motivator behind pulling advertising.
I believe the real issue is going to be ad-blocking. As more Internet users become savvy to ad blocking software, advertisers and content publishers need to become more creative in how advertising is presented to users. Advertising will become more embedded in the content that is delivered, thwarting viewer attempts at blocking. Publishers need to give viewers consequences for not viewing ads — no ads, no content.
Web 2.0 won’t die, it will just evolve. In fact, I don’t really like the term Web 2.0 anymore. This isn’t the same bubble that we saw “back in the day”. Sure, some companies are seeing ridiculous valuations with no clear business plan, but not nearly as many as there were. Contextual, non-blockable, advertising is the future of Internet advertising. However, a balance will need to be maintained to keep ads from being too invasive. I see limited invasiveness of advertising becoming a point of competition between content producers in the near future.
Pownce has developed a mobile-friendly site — optimized for browsers on small screens and light-weight to load quickly. The new mobile site is currently beta so they acknowledge that there may still be a few bugs in there. More features to come to Pownce Mobile in the coming months.
The US Federal Trade Commission regulators approved the merger with a 4-1 vote. The Commission determined that the $3.1 billion deal is “unlikely to substantially lessen competition. However, the deal still faces some challenges in Europe and potentially other places in the world. [via Wall Street Journal]
Valleywag comments that it might very well have been Microsoft’s large advertising deals that convinced the regulators that the online ad business is as competitive as Google has argued all along. However, there is no real evidence to support the claim.
Update: Mashable coverage
Earlier this week Google Talk announced that translating bots are now available. There are 24 bots available: ar2en, de2en, de2fr, el2en, en2ar, en2de, en2el, en2es, en2fr, en2it, en2ja, en2ko, en2nl, en2ru, en2zh, es2en, fr2de, fr2en, it2en, ja2en, ko2en, nl2en, ru2en, zh2en. You can message directly to one of these bots or invite them to a group chat. For example, if you were chatting with your French associate you would invite the en2fr and the fr2en bots to the conversation. As we all know, these services are never perfect but I’m sure the bot speaks better French than I do.